武裝通信與電子協會(AFCEA)指揮官TechNet印度-太平洋會議(記錄致辭)
ADM菲爾·戴維森(Phil Davidson) | 美國印度太平洋司令部公共事務辦公室| 2021年3月1日
ADM Phil Davidson
美國印度洋-太平洋司令部
夏威夷,檀香山,
2021年3月1日,已
準備交付
大家好!我希望此消息能使您身體健康。參加第一個虛擬TechNet確實是一種榮幸。
我要感謝Dick Macke海軍上將,AFCEA International和AFCEA Hawaii使這次活動成為可能。
盡管COVID提出了挑戰,但您為召開這次會議所做的努力表明了應對印度太平洋動態安全挑戰所需的適應性,創新性和毅力。
我很高興有機會在指揮期間第三次與該小組講話。
在我的首次露面時,我向您介紹了“自由和開放的印度太平洋”構想,以及它如何推動我們的聯合部隊努力并塑造了我們在該地區的做法。
然后在2019年,我討論了中國對自由開放的印度太平洋的構想的戰略威脅,特別側重于信息領域。
今天,我想分享我在接下來的幾周內向國防部和國會傳達的信息的預覽。
我的目的是提供一個總體背景,為您在本次會議期間的討論提供參考。
希望它將在接下來的幾天之內進一步激發您的專業領域內的對話,辯論和深入思考。
現在,作為我作為戰斗指揮官的職責的一部分,我必須按照《國防授權法》(NDAA)的指示,向國會提交兩份正式文件。
兩者是完全獨立但互補的,并且為了便于討論,它們講述了印度太平洋的故事。
第一個是我的年度態勢聲明,該聲明提供了印度太平洋劇院安全環境的總體狀況–它加強了我在國會面前的年度證詞聽證會。
第二個是獨立評估,概述了印度國防軍司令部最緊迫的作戰要求,以告知太平洋威懾倡議(PDI)。
這項倡議是國會在21年財政年度制定的,其目的是解決由于我們從大國競爭中面臨的威脅而導致的聯合需求缺口。
從根本上說,態勢陳述和獨立評估都是圍繞一個基本事實構建的:
我們在印度太平洋地區面臨的最大危險是對中國的傳統威懾力量的削弱。
如果沒有有效和令人信服的常規威懾力量,中國將大膽采取行動,取代已建立的以規則為基礎的國際秩序。
我們在印度太平洋地區的聯合部隊必須擺出姿勢,以提供可靠的戰斗威懾力量,以保護通過空中,海上,陸地,太空和網絡空間自由和開放地進入貿易路線。
為了有效地威懾,我們需要為聯合部隊配備適當的能力,能力,權力和原則,以支持快速的部隊使用,準確的進攻力量和有效的防御。
我們必須證明并傳達我們的意愿,以及我們對眼前政治目標的承諾。
我們必須說服北京,以軍事力量實現其目標的代價實在是太高了。
印度國防軍正在采取向前部署的縱深威懾態勢,以捍衛祖國,并在全球范圍內保護我們的價值觀和利益。
通過這樣做,我們將通過展示能力,能力和意志來否認中國的目標,并在必要時對中國軍隊施加成本,從而實現有利的安全環境。
從本質上講,我們的部隊必須具有機動性(如果愿意的話,則要敏捷),并且必須具有深厚的多領域火力才能獲得陣地優勢;我們必須利用一系列可互操作且兼容的盟友和伙伴,并且我們必須定期表現出拒絕和擊敗的“威懾力”。
為了實現所有這些目標,有四個主要重點領域可以指導INDOPACOM在該地區提供可靠的常規威懾力量的方法。
首先,我們必須增加我們的聯合殺傷力。
基本設計是一個整合的聯合部隊,它可以否定敵方在海洋,空中,陸地,太空和網絡領域中的統治能力,進而支持我們自己在各個領域進行控制和投射的能力,有時是周期性的,有時是堅持不懈。
我們的聯合部隊必須更充分地整合其網絡能力,太空部隊,特種作戰部隊以及裝備有空中火力和海上部隊遠程火力的地面部隊,以展現“致命性”,這是使對手處于危險之中的有效威懾力量。
而且,僅靠防御還不夠-用導彈抓彈是我們最難的事情-如果威懾力失敗,我們還必須保持強有力的進攻和勝利。
我們的投資和現代化工作必須利用領先技術網絡所提供的先進功能,例如:
集成的防空和導彈防御系統,采用分布在該地區的多個傳感器和攔截器來保護–不僅包括美國在內的國土,而且我們的美軍也前進。
這些防御措施還必須利用,整合和保護我們的關鍵盟友和合作伙伴。
在關島等固定地點建立的功能強大,適應能力強且經過驗證的系統(如AEGIS)將從第二島鏈提供持續的360度綜合空導彈防御。
我們擁有數十億美元的軍事能力和基礎設施,眾多的指揮與控制節點,維修,后勤和維持設施,以及成千上萬的美國公民在關島進行保護和保衛。
在夏威夷,國土防御雷達-夏威夷(HDR-H)代表了我們檢測,跟蹤,辨別和擊敗彈道,巡航和高超音速導彈威脅的能力缺口的解決方案。
遠程精確打擊可讓“緊縮”距離和環外距離的各種目標集處于危險之中。
這些先進的武器系統意義重大,絕對需要集成的跨部門和跨系統設計,以釋放聯合部隊的全部潛力。
戰斧,SM-6,LRASM,HIMARS和遠程超音速飛機的部署只是這些遠程火力的幾個例子,這需要我們的對手考慮在防御系統上進行進一步的投資。
聯合指揮與控制(C2)網絡在決策過程中提供了速度和靈活性,從而可以滲透并分解對手的系統,從而挫敗了他們的進攻能力。
戰術多用途地平線以上雷達(TACMOR)將為國際日期變更線以西的空中和地面目標提供持久,遠程,探測和跟蹤的能力。
此功能將通過對該區域的空中和地面目標進行大范圍的檢測和跟蹤來顯著提高我們的態勢意識,并提供預警以防止突發襲擊。
此外,具有快速重訪率的天基持久雷達群可提供維持對PLA活動的態勢感知的增強能力。
人工智能,量子計算,遙感,機器學習,大數據分析和5G技術的結合將提供必要的感知,C2和深火能力,以支持我們在任何競爭舞臺上的機動力量。
的確,這些能力是在危機中威懾日常的關鍵推動力,并且是我們戰斗和獲勝能力的關鍵。
第二,我們必須增強力量設計和姿勢。
過去50年對該地區的歷史考察突顯了我們在1970年代從越南,泰國和臺灣撤出并在1990年代從菲律賓撤出之后,美國部隊的態勢發生了變化。
現在,我們正在從對東北亞和關島的以服務為中心的歷史性重心向適應更加統一和分散的聯合部隊藍圖轉變。
這包括修改我們與盟國和合作伙伴的印太部隊編隊,以應對中國的快速現代化。
我們在該地區的部隊設計和姿勢必須能夠使多個領域的能力融合,并在沒有集中的情況下創造質量優勢。
這是通過在戰區的廣度和深度上分布向前部署的聯合力量,同時平衡殺傷力和生存能力來實現的。
通過前向和輪流聯合部隊持久存在是證明我們對北京的承諾和決心同時確保盟友和伙伴的最可靠方式。
這種向前的存在使聯合部隊能夠維持這些部隊在更長的時間內支持作戰行動。
它需要具有維持力和力量保護作用的威懾態勢,以使其具有韌性,生存力和可支撐性。
第三個重點領域是加強我們的盟友和伙伴。
我們的盟友和合作伙伴群是自由和開放的國際秩序的基礎,它提供了強大的力量來抵制惡性活動和侵略。
我們正在尋找一切機會,以增加與盟友和合作伙伴的聯合行動,演習和培訓的頻率和強度。
即使面對COVID大流行,我們也正在提高整個地區的互操作性和兼容性,以增強我們的能力并改善我們的競爭協調能力。
這體現在信息共享協議,外國軍售,擴大的軍事合作以及諸如TechNet之類的國際安全對話中,旨在解決我們與最親密的盟友和合作伙伴之間的共同安全問題。
任務合作伙伴環境(MPE)是一項關鍵投資,可提供彈性和冗余的聯合以及組合的命令和控制,以在所有領域進行競爭。
從戰略層面到戰術層面,MPE將通過訪問跨所有領域發揮作用的多域傳感器網絡,提供劇院范圍內的戰斗管理和自動化決策。
該環境使用基于云的技術,集成系統和安全的訪問控制來向我們的盟友和合作伙伴提供有保證的C4ISR。
為了配合這些信息共享功能,我們必須擁有一個強大的命令和控制網絡以實現可互操作的執行。
我們正在開發一種集成架構,以通過使用南亞,東南亞和大洋洲的信息融合中心,在志趣相投的國家之間橫向擴展數據共享。
這些融合中心將結合并分析飛機,輪船和天基系統的傳感器數據,在美國,我們的盟友和我們的合作伙伴之間建立共同的海上圖景,以改善對潛在的非法捕魚,販運活動和跨國公司的集體監視威脅。
第四個也是最后一個重點領域是演習,實驗和創新-不僅在聯合部隊內部,而且還包括我們的其他盟友和合作伙伴。
應對安全挑戰并展示我們在當今動態運行環境中的決心的最有效方法是通過聯合試驗和高保真,多領域培訓的持續運動。
為了實現這一目標,我們正在尋求在該地區關鍵地區建立一個實時,虛擬和建設性范圍的聯合網絡。
不幸的是,我們當前的范圍,測試和/或培訓設施是由每個部門(有時是由其服務測試和開發社區)分別構建的,而很少考慮聯合部隊。此外,他們沒有獲得資金來開展聯合培訓。
聯合部隊必須有能力通過可訪問的,大規模的,全域的和綜合的范圍,大規模地提高能力,以支持關鍵的聯合訓練和聯合訓練。
INDOPACOM是眾多服務和國家培訓,測試以及操作范圍和相關設施的所在地,并且緊鄰該地區。
一些基于CONUS的聯合示例包括:
V范登堡空軍基地的西部靶場,
海軍空戰中心,點穆古和加利福尼亞州中國湖的武器部測試場,
N內利斯空軍的內華達州測試和培訓中心基地,
歐文堡的國家培訓中心和ev內華達州的法倫靶場訓練場。
該地區還有一些OCONUS設施:
聯合太平洋阿拉斯加山脈綜合體(JPARC),
at位于考艾島Barking Sands的太平洋導彈靶場設施(PMRF)和大島上的Pohakuloa訓練靶場(PTA),以及
on夸賈林環礁上的里根試驗場(RTS)。
將我們在該地區的美國戰場與日本和澳大利亞的盟軍戰場整合在一起,將使我們能夠在裝備齊全的現場虛擬建設性試驗場中提高聯合能力和聯合能力,而這是我們的盟國和合作伙伴目前所沒有的。
一支由美國和盟軍組成的綜合部隊,定期展示其在各個領域的作戰行動,對潛在的對手提出了新的挑戰和困境。
當然,最好的方法是通過高端,多領域的聯合練習。
我們正在將我們的聯合演習計劃現代化,使其成為一系列在西太平洋隨時間和空間有意鏈接的聯合演習和聯合演習。
INDOPACOM聯合演習計劃將整合現有的靶場,訓練區域和測試設施,以產生部隊的戰備能力,測試新興能力并滿足戰區需求。
的確,先進的“聯合演習計劃”與“聯合范圍網絡”相結合,使我們能夠揭示我們希望對手看到的某些能力,并隱藏我們不希望他們看到的事物。
這是任何威懾策略的主要組成部分。
最終狀態是一個綜合聯盟,可以有效地展示所有領域的行動,確保我們的國際準則得到保護,并阻止潛在對手采取軍事行動。
美國必須與我們的盟國和合作伙伴一道,實施一項不斷發展的常規威懾戰略,以證明其能力,能力和贏得競爭的意愿。
我在INDOPACOM的團隊做了出色的工作,為該地區設計了一個框架,以推動在競爭,危機和沖突中獲勝所需的戰略舉措和運營理念。
現在,我需要您的幫助來進行此設計,并繼續在劇院中進行改進。
這是通過促進創新,批判性思考,發展專業知識,具有挑戰性的假設以及共同努力實現聯合部隊的全部潛力來實現的。
我們所有人都在推動聯合部隊應對印度太平洋地區未來的安全挑戰和機遇方面發揮了作用。
我感謝您今天的時間,以及您希望改善印度太平洋(實際上是地球上最關鍵的地區)的繁榮與安全的愿望。
全文英文原文:
AFCEA TechNet Indo-Pacific Conference
By ADM Phil Davidson | U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, Public Affairs Office | March 1, 2021
ADM Phil Davidson
Commander, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command
Armed Forces Communications & Electronics Association (AFCEA) TechNet Indo-Pacific Conference (Recorded Remarks)
HONOLULU, Hawaii
1 March 2021
As Prepared for Delivery
Aloha everyone! I hope this message finds you well and in good health. It is truly a pleasure to participate in the first virtual TechNet.
I would like to thank Admiral Dick Macke, AFCEA International, and AFCEA Hawaii for making this event possible.
Your efforts to host this conference despite the challenges presented by COVID demonstrates the type of adaptability, innovation, and perseverance needed to address the dynamic security challenges in the Indo-Pacific.
I am grateful for the opportunity to address this group for the third time while in command.
In my first appearance, I spoke to you about the Free and Open Indo-Pacific vision and how it drives our Joint Force efforts and shapes our approach in the region.
Then in 2019, I discussed China’s strategic threat to the idea of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific with special emphasis on the information domain.
Today, I would like to share a preview of the message I am delivering to the Department of Defense and Congress over the next few weeks.
My intent is to provide an overarching context that informs your discussions during this conference.
Hopefully it will also spark further dialogue, debate, and deep thought within your professional circles, well beyond the next few days.
Now, as part of my duties as a combatant commander, I am required to submit two official documents to Congress – as directed by the National Defense Authorization Act (the NDAA).
The two are entirely separate but complimentary and – for ease of discussion – they tell the story of the Indo-Pacific.
The first is my annual posture statement that provides the overall status of the security environment in the Indo-Pacific Theater – it reinforces my annual testimony hearing before Congress.
The second is an independent assessment outlining INDOPACOM’s most pressing warfighting requirements to inform the Pacific Deterrence Initiative (or PDI).
The initiative was established by Congress in Fiscal Year 21 specifically to address joint requirement shortfalls given the threats we face from Great Power Competition.
Foundationally, both the posture statement and independent assessment were constructed around one fundamental truth:
The greatest danger we face in the Indo-Pacific region is the erosion of conventional deterrence vis-à-vis China.
Without a valid and convincing conventional deterrent, China will be emboldened to take action to supplant the established rules-based international order.
Our Joint Forces in the Indo-Pacific must be postured to provide combat credible deterrence to protect free and open access to trade routes through the air, sea, land, space, and cyberspace.
To effectively deter, we need to arm the Joint Force with the proper capabilities, capacities, authorities, and indeed the doctrine to support rapid force employment, accurate offensive power, and effective defenses.
And we have to demonstrate – and communicate – our will – and our commitment to the political object at hand.
We must convince Beijing that the costs to achieve its objectives by military force are simply too high.
INDOPACOM is pursuing a forward deployed, deterrence-in-depth posture to defend the homeland and protect our values and interests globally.
In doing so, we will achieve an advantageous security environment by demonstrating the capability, capacity, and will to deny China’s objectives and – if necessary – to impose costs on their military forces.
At the heart of it, our forces must be maneuverable – agile if you will – and have the depth of multi-domain fires needed to achieve positional advantage; we must leverage an array of interoperable and compatible allies and partners, and we must regularly demonstrate the “deterability” to deny and defeat.
To accomplish all of this, there are four key focus areas that guide INDOPACOM’s approach to providing combat credible conventional deterrence in the region.
First, we must increase our joint force lethality.
The fundamental design is an integrated Joint Force that can deny an adversary’s ability to dominate the sea, air, land, space, and cyber domains – and in turn, support our own ability to control and project in all domains, sometimes periodically, and sometimes persistently.
Our Joint Force must more fully integrate its cyber capabilities, space forces, special operations forces, and ground forces equipped with long-range fires with air and maritime forces to present the “lethality” – the effective deterrent that holds an adversary at risk.
And it is not enough to play defense alone – catching missiles with missiles is the hardest thing we do – we must also maintain a strong offense to fight and win should deterrence fail.
Our investments and modernization efforts must harness the advanced capabilities provided by a network of leading-edge technologies, such as:
Integrated Air and Missile Defenses that employ multiple sensors and interceptors distributed across the region to protect – not only the Homeland including our U.S. territories, but also our U.S. forces forward.
These defenses must leverage, integrate, and protect our critical allies and partners as well.
A highly capable, fully adaptable, and proven system – like AEGIS – established in fixed locations like Guam, will deliver persistent 360-degree, integrated air missile defense from the Second Island Chain.
We have billions of dollars in military capability and infrastructure, numerous command and control nodes, repair and logistics and sustainment facilities, and thousands of U.S. citizens to protect and defend in Guam.
And here in Hawaii, the Homeland Defense Radar-Hawaii (HDR-H) represents the solution for the gap in our ability to detect, track, discriminate, and defeat ballistic, cruise, and hypersonic missile threats.
Long Range Precision Strike to hold at risk a variety of target sets from distances both “in the clinch” and from outside the ring.
These advanced weapons systems are significant and absolutely require an integrated, cross-Service and cross-system design to unleash the full potential of the Joint Force.
The deployment of Tomahawk, SM-6, LRASM, HIMARS, and Long Range Hypersonics are but a few examples of these long range fires that will require our adversaries to consider further investment in defense systems.
Joint Command and Control (C2) Networks provide speed and flexibility in decision-making, which allows penetration and then disintegration of an adversary’s systems, thereby defeating their offensive capabilities.
The Tactical Multi-Mission Over-the-Horizon Radar (TACMOR) will provide a persistent, long-range, detect and track capability of air and surface targets west of the International Date Line.
This capability will dramatically increase our situational awareness with wide-area, detection, and tracking of air and surface targets in the region and provide early warning to prevent surprise attacks.
Additionally, a constellation of Space-Based Persistent Radars with rapid revisit rates to provide the ability to maintain a heightened situational awareness of PLA activity.
The combination of artificial Intelligence, quantum computing, remote sensing, machine learning, big data analytics, and 5G technology will provide the necessary sensing, C2, and deep fires capabilities to support our maneuver forces in any contested arena.
Indeed, these capabilities are critical enablers to deter day-to-day, in crisis, and key to our ability to fight and win.
Second, we must enhance our force design and posture.
A historical look at the region over the past 50 years highlights the shift of our U.S. force posture as we moved out of Vietnam, Thailand, and Taiwan in the 1970s and then out of the Philippines in the 1990s.
Now, we are adapting from our historic Service-centric focus on Northeast Asia and Guam toward a more integrated and distributed Joint Force blueprint.
This includes revising our Indo-Pacific force laydown with our allies and partners to account for China’s rapid modernization.
Our force design and posture in the region must enable the convergence of capabilities from multiple domains and create the virtues of mass without concentration.
This is accomplished by distributing a forward-deployed, joint force across the battlespace's breadth and depth while balancing lethality and survivability.
Persistent presence thru forward-based and rotational joint forces is the most credible way to demonstrate our commitment and resolve to Beijing, while simultaneously assuring allies and partners.
This forward presence allows the Joint Force to sustain these forces to support combat operations over extend time periods.
It requires a deterrent posture that possesses the sustainment and force protection to be resilient, survivable, and supportable.
The third focus area is strengthening our allies and partners.
Our constellation of allies and partners is the backbone of the free and open international order, providing a powerful force to counter malign activity and aggression.
We are seeking every opportunity to increase the frequency and intensity of our combined operations, exercises, and training with our allies and partners.
Even in the face of the COVID pandemic, we are increasing our interoperability and compatibility across the region to enhance our capabilities and improve our coordination for competition.
This manifests itself in information sharing agreements, foreign military sales, expanded military cooperation, and international security dialogues – such as TechNet – designed to address our mutual security concerns alongside our closest allies and partners.
The Mission Partner Environment (MPE) is the critical investment that provides for resilient and redundant joint and combined command and control to compete across all domains.
From the strategic to tactical level, MPE will provide theater-wide battle management and automated decision-making by accessing a multi-domain sensor network that functions across all domains.
This environment uses cloud-based technologies, integrated systems, and secure access controls to provide assured C4ISR with our allies and partners.
To accompany these info-sharing functions, we must have a robust command and control network for interoperable execution.
We are developing an integrated architecture to horizontally expand data-sharing among like-minded nations through the use of information fusion centers in South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Oceania.
These fusion centers will combine and analyze sensor data from aircraft, ships, and space-based systems, building a common maritime picture between the U.S, our allies, and our partners to improve our collective surveillance of potential illegal fishing, trafficking activities, and transnational threats.
The fourth and final focus area is exercises, experimentation, and innovation – not only within the Joint Force – but with our other allies and partners as well.
The most effective way to combat the security challenges and demonstrate our resolve in today’s dynamic operating environment is through a continuous campaign of joint experimentation and high-fidelity, multi-domain training.
To accomplish this, we are pursuing the development of a joint network of live, virtual, and constructive ranges in key locations around the region.
Unfortunately, our current range, test, and/or training facilities are built separately by each Service – sometimes by their Service test and development community – and rarely with the Joint Force in mind. Further, they are not funded to enable joint training.
The Joint Force must have the ability to advance capability at scale – through accessible, large-scale, all-domain, and integrated ranges to support critical joint and combined training and exercises.
INDOPACOM is home to – and in close proximity to – numerous Service and national training, testing, and operational ranges and related facilities.
Some CONUS-based, joint examples include:
The Western Range at Vandenberg Air Force Base,-
The Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division test ranges in Point Mugu and China Lake, California,-
The Nevada Test and Training Center at Nellis Air Force Base,-
The The National Training Center at Fort Irwin, and-
The Fallon Range Training Complex in Nevada.-
And there are also several OCONUS facilities in the region:
The Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex (JPARC),-
The Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) at Barking Sands on Kauai and the Pohakuloa Training Range (PTA) on the Big Island, and-
The Reagan Test Site (RTS) on the Kwajalein atoll.-
Integrating our U.S. ranges in the region with allied ranges in Japan and Australia will allow us to advance joint and combined capability and capacity in a fully instrumented live-virtual-constructive proving ground – something our allies and partners do not have currently.
An integrated U.S. and coalition force that regularly demonstrates operations across all domains presents new challenges and dilemmas to potential adversaries.
Certainly, the best way to accomplish this is through high-end, multi-domain, joint exercises.
We are modernizing our Joint Exercise Program into a series of joint and coalition exercises deliberately linked over time and space in the Western Pacific.
The INDOPACOM Joint Exercise Program will integrate existing ranges, training areas, and test facilities to generate force readiness, test emerging capabilities, and drive theater requirements.
Indeed, an advanced Joint Exercise Program – combined with a Joint Range Network – provides us the ability to reveal certain capabilities we want our adversaries to see and conceal the things we do not want them to see.
This is a major component of any strategy of deterrence.
The end state is an integrated coalition that can demonstrate operations effectively in all domains, assuring our international norms are protected and dissuading potential adversaries from military action.
The United States – alongside our allies and partners – must implement an evolving conventional deterrence strategy that demonstrates its capacity, its capability, and its will to win this competition.
My team at INDOPACOM has done an exceptional job designing a framework for the region to drive the strategic initiatives and operational concepts required to win in competition, crisis, and conflict.
Now, I need your help to take this design and continue to advance it in the theater.
This is done by fostering innovation, thinking critically, developing expertise, challenging assumptions, and working collectively to realize the full potential of our Joint Force.
We all play a part in advancing our Joint Force for the future security challenges and opportunities in the Indo-Pacific.
I thank you for your time today and for your desire to improve the prosperity and security of the Indo-Pacific – indeed, the most critical region on the planet.
來源:平原書院微信公眾號
1、本文只代表作者個人觀點,不代表本站觀點,僅供大家學習參考;
2、本站屬于非營利性網站,如涉及版權和名譽問題,請及時與本站聯系,我們將及時做相應處理;
3、歡迎各位網友光臨閱覽,文明上網,依法守規,IP可查。
作者 相關信息
內容 相關信息
突發!俄羅斯最終攤牌,“新八國聯軍”齊聚莫斯科,美軍司令釋放核戰信號,暴風雨要來了!
2021-02-05? 昆侖專題 ?
? 高端精神 ?
? 新征程 新任務 新前景 ?
? 習近平治國理政 理論與實踐 ?
? 我為中國夢獻一策 ?
? 國資國企改革 ?
? 雄安新區建設 ?
? 黨要管黨 從嚴治黨 ?
圖片新聞