久久福利青草精品资源站免费,综合欧美小说另类图,国产精品麻豆

97年后的缺席——中國青年就南海仲裁案致海牙國際法庭各位法官公開信（中英文版）

點擊：作者：中國青年來源：中華全國學聯發布時間:2016-05-29 09:06:47

菲律賓無視中國政府警告，單方面向海牙國際海洋法庭提出所謂“南海仲裁案”。中國部分青年學生就此致信海牙國際法庭，表達了中國青年學生的鮮明立場。

97年后的缺席

海牙國際法庭的各位法官：

閑悉所謂的南海仲裁案，將于近期在海牙國際法庭宣判。中國政府對此的態度是明確的，那就是不參與，不接受，不承認。中國的代表將不會出現在南海仲裁案的法庭上，而這也注定無法成為對中國的缺席審判。說到缺席，我們的思緒被拉回到了97年之前，1919年。同樣是在溫和濕潤的歐洲大陸上，中國的代表曾經經歷另一次毅然的缺席：那便是中國代表拒絕在巴黎和會上簽字。時隔97年，中國人變了嗎？

1919年的中國，正處風雨飄搖，國力衰微之際。當時的民國政府，尚軍閥割據，四分五裂。我們無力處理主權方面的爭端，對外國的入侵也只能是默然許之。因此，在德國所侵占的膠東半島和幾座軍港上，日本遠征軍進行了對德戰爭并成為了一戰的戰勝國。而在巴黎和會中，同樣作為戰勝國的中國卻要蒙受領土被再度割占的恥辱，并被要求將山東劃給日本。這一幕，在中國的愛國電影《建國大業》中被完美重現，外交代表顧維鈞拒絕簽字時那氣壯河山的演說。是的，山東是中國的領土，我們作為戰勝國，憑什么要將自己國家的一部分，拿去送給日本人？

這樣的話，說著是有底氣的。當時的中國國內，剛剛爆發了五四運動，全體的年輕人，胸膛里都燒著愛國而憤怒的烈火。他們為國為民，支持外交人員，堅強不屈。正是這一磚一瓦地堆壘起來的中國青年的愛國心，成就了當時羸弱的國家的底氣。近百年后的今天，面對所謂的裁決和所謂的協約，中國人再次缺席，又是因為領土主權的爭執。而這次，站在中國的外交家背后的，已不只是熱血沸騰的學子，更是蒸蒸日上的國家實力。

西漢名將陳湯曾在給漢元帝的上書中表示，明犯強漢者，雖遠必誅。這句話成為了支撐百代中國人維護主權和領土完整的口號。疆不分遠近，地不分大小，人不分男女老幼，而敵之犯我，必共抗之。如果到了海權意識迅速發展的21世紀，還有國家抱著中國會在遙遠的一隅小島上“放水”的幻想，那么就是大錯特錯。無論這塊疆土位于中國的什么地方，無論它富庶抑或荒涼，都是中國神圣不可分割的一部分，舍棄了，便是對歷史的背叛，對未來的失職。我們必須對青年負責，對未來負責。也許法庭會對此感到疑惑，既然中國人如此在意南海星羅棋布的列島，何不參與到對菲仲裁中，而選擇了缺席呢？

答案是，我們從未缺席。

人活在世，行文處事，都要講究方式方法，國家間的交往亦然。中國從形式上缺席了南海的仲裁，正是因為它形式上的不合法。我們無必向各位法官重申中國政府的觀點，也無必重述我們與南海各方間雙邊解決的協議，我們只需要向各位法官表態，在道德為王的法庭上，中國不會缺席；在主權攸關的審判上，中國不會缺席；在實力寫就的歷史上，中國不會缺席。97年前中國代表缺席了巴黎和會簽字，是對主權一種無可奈何的自保；而今天中國人的缺席，是因為我們正將更多的精力放到真正地解決問題的途徑上。習近平主席曾言，空談誤國，實干興邦。當中國的青年正奮力團結于中國夢的感召之下，為全面提升祖國的實力而奮斗時，來自地球另一端的弦外之音便早已如熏風過耳，雖吹毫而不驚了。

王毅外長近日答阿拉伯媒體記者問時，回應說自己不喜歡將某個世紀叫做某個國家的世紀，無論是“美國的20世紀”還是“中國的21世紀”。因為每個世紀的命運乃至人類的命運，都是各國人民自己書寫的。但這只如椽的巨筆，必須按照各國人民能夠接受的方式落下，必須沿著公平正義的軌跡寫就，而絕非按照某些國家所提出的南海國際化等下策，在一片狺狺中草草收篇。面對錯綜復雜的國際局勢和變幻多端的南海風云，中國人過去沒有缺席，今天不會缺席，未來更不會缺席——并且會制定屬于自己的游戲規則，孰勝孰負，還請諸君拭目以待。

就是這樣一群普通的青年人，在忙碌的學習生活之余，向海牙同樣忙碌的法官們寫完了這樣一封信。無論我們的年齡懸殊之大、地位尊卑之顯，我們顯然都沒有過多的時間去領味生命中的嘈雜，那么不妨躬親戮力，都多去做一點實事——“牢騷太盛防腸斷，風物長宜放眼量”。

此致

敬禮！

南開大學姚春

燕山大學里仁學院王玥

山西大學季明

內蒙古工業大學賈金曉

吉林大學馬晨

華東政法大學闞琪

蘇州大學朱琳

寧波大學姚丹春

合肥工業大學汪斌

廈門大學蔡曉娜

福建師范大學鄭鷹

南昌大學吳雪晨

山東大學李彤

鄭州大學喻耀

湖南大學王文娟

湘潭大學陳緒林

華南理工大學吳芷亦

廣東東軟學院江旭東

北京科技大學呂鑫

大同大學程升譽

東北農業大學李樹愛

東華大學傅煌

河南理工大學閆李月

河南工程學院彭托婭

2016年5月28日

Absence after 97 years

Distinguished judges from the Hague：

It is said that the so-called Arbitration on the South China Sea will declare its result in the International Court of Justice in Hague in the near future. The Chinese government has already clearly stated its stance, that is non-participation, non-acceptance, and non-recognition. Chinese representatives will be absent in the court, so it is impossible to bring the trial with China’s absence. Concerning the China’s absence, it dates back to 1919. 97 years ago, also on the European continent, with its mild and wet climate, the Chinese representatives resolutely chose to be absent by refusing to sign the treaties of the Paris Peace Conference. After these 97 years, could we Chinese change our standing?

Exhausted and deprived, China in 1919 was plagued by foreign aggression and internal conflicts. The nationalist government at that time was tore apart by the warlords. China was impotent in handling the sovereignty disputes, so she had to remain silent in the face of foreign aggression. On the Shandong Peninsula and military ports occupied by Germany, which is the properties of China, Japanese expeditionary force launched attack against Germany and became a victor in WWI. While China, also a victor in WWI, had to endure another humiliation of losing territory and was demanded to cede Shandong to Japan during the Paris Peace Conference . This scene was vividly reproduced in the patriotic film A blockbuster Founding of the Republic when Chinese representative Gu Weijun refused to sign the treaty and delivered a sublime and heroic speech. Undoubtedly, Shandong is the territory of China. And why could we China, being the victor of the war, give away a part of our country to Japan?

These words are well-founded. Because the May 4^th Movement just broke out at that time, during which all the young Chinese, with the burning flame in the heart with patriotism and indignation, gave their perseverant support to the diplomats for the sake of nation and people. What to build the foundation of this weak country were exactly those patriotic souls of young Chinese. Today, after nearly a century, the Chinese are once again absent from the so-called arbitration and agreement concerning territory and sovereignty dispute. And at this time, the backbone of these diplomats are not only the students burning with righteous indignation, but also a country with surging power.

A well-known general of the Western Han dynasty, Chen Tang has written in a memorial to the throne that for those who encroaches upon we great China, we shall be bound to revenge no matter how far they run away! This sentence has become a slogan which supports hundred generations of the Chinese to safeguard the sovereignty and territorial integrity of China. When enemy invades, no matter how far the frontier is, no matter how little the territory is, all the Chinese, men, women, young and old, will rise up and fight back. In the 21st century, when sea power conscience is in full fledge, anyone who bears the illusion that China will shrink back and give up a little island because of its vast distance is committing a serious mistake. All territories, far or near, rich or desolate, are sacred parts of China. It constitutes the treason to the history and dereliction to the future. We must be responsible to the young Chinese and our future. The court may have such doubt that since China attaches such an importance to the scattered islands in the South China Sea, then why does it choose to be absent instead of taking part in the arbitration against the Philippines?

The answer is, we are never absent.

The manner holds the key for a man living in this world. This applies to the international relations. China is seemingly absent because the arbitration on the South China Sea is apparently illegal. It is unnecessary to reiterate the stance of Chinese government to you judges, let alone the bilateral agreement China signed with the parties concerned. All we need to do is to inform all the judges that in a court where ethic is the rule, China is never absent; in a trial where sovereignty is at stake, China is never absent; in the history written by power, China is never absent. The China’s absence 97 years ago demonstrates that China at that time had no choice if she would defend her sovereignty. But today the absence is due to the fact that we concentrate on the practical solutions to solve the problem. President Xi Jinping has said that empty talk will hamper the development of country, while solid work will revitalize the country. The contemporary young Chinese are united by the inspiration of Chinese dream in their struggle for a prosperous China, and the inharmonious sound from the other end of the world will no longer be disturbing.

Recently，Foreign minister Wang Yi responded the inquiry from a Arab media reporter, he said he didn't like naming a century as “a nation’s century，whether it is “the 20th century of the United States”or “the 21st century of China”. Because the fate of every century，and even the fate of human beings are written by the world people. But like a rafter, this giant pen must follow the way people from different countries can accept, must be written along the path of justice, rather than following an unwise strategy some countries have put forward which is to internationalize the problem of the South China Sea, then solve this problem hastily. In the complicated international environment and the changeable situation of the South China Sea, the Chinese had not been absent in the past, not absent today, and definitely not absent in the future, and they will make their own game rules, so who will be the winner or loser, let’s wait and see.

This letter comes from a group of ordinary young people, in the busy study life, which express out feeling to you similarly busy judges in the Hague. No matter how different between you and us on age and status, obviously, we have not too much time to taste the noise in life, so we are supposed to do something practical, just like a poetry says, “Too much complaint would make your heart break; so look farther when you make judgment .”

With respect！

Yours sincerely